Comments on: Do you think what Mark Ecko did to Barry Bonds’ home run ball could be considered slander?

By: LawGunGuy

LawGunGuy — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:35:02 +0000

Slander? No. Libel? Perhaps.

Definitely not slander, since it is a WRITTEN insult.

Additionally, Bonds himself has put himself in the position of being accused of taking steroids, so he himself has created the controversy. Additionally, in a court, I don’t see ANY jury giving a verdict to Bonds following what he’s said about steroids, abuse and his own use.

The truth is a defense to both libel and slander and Bonds has used steroids!

By: Rob B

Rob B — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:35:02 +0000

If it’s slander then Barry has to prove it isn’t true.

By: pincollector

pincollector — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:35:02 +0000

Yes, why not. Ecko is a clown. He looks like K-Fed’s father.
http://marceckoenterprises.com/images/marc/320//3.jpg

By: captaincarney

captaincarney — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:35:02 +0000

No, becuase it is the will of the people. Mark Ecko did not say Bonds cheated (though he did say he voted for the astrisk). The public voted (I voted 5 times for the winning choice).

By: Mac Boswell

Mac Boswell — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:35:02 +0000

I don’t Car about the Ball or Barry the cheater Bonds.
If you cheat its not a record to me.