is this an example of legal theft? [privately owned money supply]?
- 3 Comment
that any country can allow the money supply to be in private hands is just supersupersuper incredible – the moneycontrollers can pump money to themselves endlessly at will – increase money supply, which lowers interest rates, borrow money cheaply, decrease money supply, & lend at high interest rates the money they borrowed at low interest rates – money for nothing, legal theft – it is like always having inside stockmarket info, as portrayed in the film ‘trading places’ [one of the few films in which any potent information has been allowed to get to the ppl] – there is an hypothesis around that garfield, lincoln & kennedy were assassinated because they were pro-people enough [uncorrupt enough] to fight against the privately owned federal reserve
why why why why WHY!!!???? do the ppl every time allow unlimited overwealth, which is unlimited political overpower, raise its filthy ugly tyrannical head & eat peace & democracy & liberty & justice & freetrade for all??????????????????????????
3 Comments on this post
Trackbacks
-
Professor Science said:
why indeed. This is an excellent question and one that needs to be openly discussed.
July 4th, 2009 at 10:53 pm -
joechuksy said:
Yes it is theft, greed and a total lack of compassion.
It’s the order of the day in Africa. Nigeria was coached by the british. The saudi’s were coached by the US, who are now also trying to coach those poor Iraqi puppets.July 4th, 2009 at 10:53 pm
[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]